During the 1950’s most of America lived in a state of normalcy, and standard life styles. It was “the age of the grey flannel suit, suburbia, and other sterile forces” (Mailer 1957). However, even in this age of standardized suburban lifestyles, there were still those who went against the social norm. Perhaps the best examples of people who go against society’s norms in the 50’s are jazz musicians such as Charlie Parker and Thelonious Monk. According to Mailer these jazz musicians offered an alternative model of masculinity in these times.
In order to understand Mailers statement we need to first understand what he means by masculinity. In “The White Negro” Mailer elaborates about how those who go against society are hipsters, and they are only interested in themselves and bodily pleasures. He says that hipsters seek love as “as the search for an orgasm more apocalyptic than the one which preceded it” and later says that “jazz is orgasm” (Mailer 1957). This leads to the impression that Mailer sees jazz musicians as a major part of the hipster community. When Mailer talks about a new masculinity in the country, he is talking about these hipsters who go against the social norms.
Charlie Parker Is the embodiment of everything that Mailer describes when he talks about hipsters. Charlie Parker was a heroin addict, who abused women and used them for his pleasure. In Mile Davis’ autobiography, Miles describes how Charlie Parker received oral sex in the back seat of a taxi while eating chicken and high on heroin, even though Miles was in the seat next to him (Miles 1989). Not only did Charlie Parker go against social norms in his methods of indulging himself, he also went against social norms when it came to music. Charlie Parker both lived his life, and played his music how he wanted, not how society told him to, and because of this he became an icon of independence and gave rise to this new type of masculinity in the 50’s.
On the other hand, Thelonious Monk went very strongly against the social norms in his music, but not as much so in his social life. Thelonious Monk helped create bebop, and filled his music with disjoint rhythms, and dissonant chords. His music was unique and became on icon of change and the hip movement, even though Monk himself did not base himself around physical pleasures in the way that Mailer says hipsters live.
Monk and Parker did exhibit the new masculinity that Mailer describes in “The White Negro”, Monk through his music and Parker through both his music and his life. Because of their lifestyles and music they became icons to much of America after World War Two. However, it should be noted that this is nothing new for jazz. When jazz first started, it was played in brothels and jazz has always thrived in areas where social vice ran rampart (Storyville, Chicago and Kansas City while under mob control). If anyone was to go against social norms, and live a life based around physical pleasure, it would be expected for that person to be part of the jazz scene. So yes Charlie Parker and Thelonious Monk were social icons, and they did live their lives in contrast with social norms, but when one considers the background of jazz, it would be more surprising if jazz musicians and followers went along with the social norms of this time than against them. The new masculinity that jazz musicians embodied was more of a property of jazz than of the musicians.